I have been wanting to read a good book on Nvidia for a while and was debating between Stephen Witt’s “The Thinking Machine” and Tae Kim’s “The Nvidia Way”. In the former, Witt offers a narrative account of Jensen Huang and Nvidia that stands in quiet contrast to Tae Kim’s book which seems to be largely concerned with organisational culture, management discipline, and repeatable processes, Witt positions his work as a more personal exploration. That distinction is what led me to this book. I picked it up hoping to understand the man behind Nvidia better – not the mechanics of execution, but the human elements.
A good biography, particularly of a contemporary business figure, has a few essential ingredients in my view. It should ideally surface insights or anecdotes that are not already part of the public record, offering the reader something genuinely new. Alternatively, even familiar material can work if the underlying story is complex, conflicted, or inherently dramatic. Finally, the narrative shape matters. Lives, like companies, rarely progress in clean arcs, and a sense of uncertainty often makes the story more compelling.
Viewed through that lens, “The Thinking Machine” feels somewhat constrained. The book offers little in the way of new revelation; much of it reads as a polished narration of Nvidia’s well-known history. The story itself is also notably linear. Huang co-founds Nvidia, the company steadily grinds forward, places an early bet on parallel computing, then spends years in relative obscurity before AI finally provides the long-awaited payoff. While the outcome is undeniably impressive, the journey lacks sustained tension. Huang emerges as driven, but rarely conflicted, which leaves the narration feeling more observational than intimate.
That said, the book has some clear virtues. Witt writes with clarity, the pacing is brisk, and the book never feels bloated. For readers looking for a coherent, readable account of how Nvidia became central to the AI revolution, “The Thinking Machine” does its job well, even if it stops short of probing deeply.
Pros: Clear narrative, accessible writing
Cons: Limited insight










